Do Not Sell My Personal Information
RugbyPass Match Centre
Scores
Sorry there are no live games.
See what's coming up.
No games this week.
Full schedule >
Auckland AUC Manawatu MAN Sun
27 Sep
3:00am SAST
Taranaki TAR Otago OTA Sun
27 Sep
3:00am SAST
Counties COU Northland NOR Sun
27 Sep
5:15am SAST
Bay of Plenty BAY Auckland AUC Fri
2 Oct
8:00am SAST
Counties COU Manawatu MAN Sat
3 Oct
3:00am SAST
Northland NOR Taranaki TAR Sat
3 Oct
5:15am SAST
Canterbury CAN Wellington WEL Sat
3 Oct
8:00am SAST
Southland SOU Waikato WAI Sun
4 Oct
3:00am SAST
North Harbour HAR Tasman TAS Sun
4 Oct
3:00am SAST
Otago OTA Hawke's Bay HAW Sun
4 Oct
5:15am SAST
Manawatu MAN Canterbury CAN Fri
9 Oct
8:00am SAST
North Harbour HAR Hawke's Bay HAW Sat
10 Oct
3:00am SAST
Taranaki TAR Auckland AUC Sat
10 Oct
3:00am SAST
Wellington WEL Otago OTA Sat
10 Oct
5:15am SAST
Waikato WAI Counties COU Sat
10 Oct
8:00am SAST
Northland NOR Southland SOU Sun
11 Oct
2:10am SAST
Tasman TAS Bay of Plenty BAY Sun
11 Oct
2:10am SAST
Hawke's Bay HAW Northland NOR Fri
16 Oct
8:00am SAST
Wellington WEL North Harbour HAR Sat
17 Oct
3:00am SAST
Manawatu MAN Bay of Plenty BAY Sat
17 Oct
3:00am SAST
Auckland AUC Tasman TAS Sat
17 Oct
5:15am SAST
Southland SOU Taranaki TAR Sat
17 Oct
8:00am SAST
Canterbury CAN Waikato WAI Sun
18 Oct
2:10am SAST
Otago OTA Counties COU Sun
18 Oct
2:10am SAST
Otago OTA Northland NOR Fri
23 Oct
8:00am SAST
Bay of Plenty BAY Canterbury CAN Sat
24 Oct
3:00am SAST
Hawke's Bay HAW Manawatu MAN Sat
24 Oct
5:15am SAST
North Harbour HAR Auckland AUC Sat
24 Oct
8:00am SAST
Counties COU Wellington WEL Sun
25 Oct
3:00am SAST
Tasman TAS Southland SOU Sun
25 Oct
3:00am SAST
Waikato WAI Taranaki TAR Sun
25 Oct
5:15am SAST
Canterbury CAN Otago OTA Fri
30 Oct
8:00am SAST
Wellington WEL Tasman TAS Sat
31 Oct
3:00am SAST
Northland NOR North Harbour HAR Sat
31 Oct
5:15am SAST
Auckland AUC Waikato WAI Sat
31 Oct
8:00am SAST
Bay of Plenty BAY Hawke's Bay HAW Sun
1 Nov
3:00am SAST
Manawatu MAN Southland SOU Sun
1 Nov
3:00am SAST
Taranaki TAR Counties COU Sun
1 Nov
5:15am SAST
Southland SOU Otago OTA Fri
6 Nov
8:00am SAST
Auckland AUC Northland NOR Sat
7 Nov
3:00am SAST
North Harbour HAR Counties COU Sat
7 Nov
5:15am SAST
Tasman TAS Canterbury CAN Sat
7 Nov
8:00am SAST
Hawke's Bay HAW Wellington WEL Sun
8 Nov
3:00am SAST
Waikato WAI Bay of Plenty BAY Sun
8 Nov
3:00am SAST
Manawatu MAN Taranaki TAR Sun
8 Nov
5:15am SAST
Counties COU Southland SOU Fri
13 Nov
8:00am SAST
Northland NOR Waikato WAI Sat
14 Nov
3:00am SAST
Otago OTA Tasman TAS Sat
14 Nov
5:15am SAST
Wellington WEL Manawatu MAN Sat
14 Nov
8:00am SAST
Bay of Plenty BAY North Harbour HAR Sun
15 Nov
3:00am SAST
Taranaki TAR Hawke's Bay HAW Sun
15 Nov
3:00am SAST
Canterbury CAN Auckland AUC Sun
15 Nov
5:15am SAST
Fri 11 Sep 2020 | 07:28

Revealed: All the excuses Farrell used at his hearing

Revealed: All the excuses Farrell used at his hearing
Fri 11 Sep 2020 | 07:28
Revealed: All the excuses Farrell used at his hearing
SHARE

SPOTLIGHT: The Rugby Football Union published the 10-page short-form written judgment regarding the five-match ban handed down to England captain Owen Farrell.

ADVERTISEMENT

This follows his red card for a tackle on Wasps teenager Charlie Atkinson last week.

There has been much commentary following Tuesday’s disciplinary hearing over how the initially proposed 10-match entry point punishment was reduced to five, when off-field character mitigations were taken into account.

That reduction has left Farrell free to resume playing from October 5, making him available to feature in the Champions Cup Final, should defending champions Saracens qualify, and then link up with the England squad ahead of their October 25 season resumption – when they face the Barbarians at Twickenham, a game that will be followed by five Test matches.

Speaking in his defence at the hearing that was held virtually, the RFU’s written judgment – which was published on Friday – details how Farrell told the panel he was 28, had 201 Premiership games for Saracens, 83 England caps, four Tests for the British and Irish Lions and was also the current England captain.

Explaining the mechanics of his high tackle on Atkinson which resulted in his 61st minute Allianz Park red card, Farrell said he kicked the ball and intended to chase the Wasps youngster and tackle him from the side.

He claimed he could see Atkinson was a bit hesitant and he thought he could get to him, adding how he was aiming for his arm below the shoulder in the hope of simultaneously possibly dislodging the ball.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I was expecting to hit him between his shoulder and arm,” said Farrell to the panel, explaining that he had lunged at the middle of Atkinson’s arm in the hope of dislodging the ball as he tackled and as he did so his head went to the right-hand side of Atkinson.

Farrell admitted he did not appreciate Atkinson’s slight change of direction given the pace he was running and accepted he did not control his contact with his opponent as he should have done.

The judgment continued: “He [Farrell] did not set out to tackle high. He was unaware that Atkinson dipped slightly as he checked. On contact, he knew that he had gone over the shoulder and that the contact had gone wrong.

“He apologised on the field. After he was dismissed, he waited at the side of the pitch for Atkinson, apologised to him and again in the clubhouse. He was gutted that he had caused the injury. He had not stopped thinking about it and was very disappointed in himself. He never ever thought he would get a red card as he had much pride and energy in setting high standards for himself. He said what he had done set a bad example.”

ADVERTISEMENT

To help convince the panel to apply the full mitigation to the punishment they intended to give to Farrell, the England skipper’s representative Richard Smith referred to how Paul Gabrillagues of France had successfully appealed the six-week ban handed down to him last year prior to the World Cup and got it halved to three.

Considering the evidence, the panel deemed the Farrell tackle to be reckless.

“This was a badly executed tackle, committed at high speed which resulted in the removal of Atkinson from the field of play.”

The judgment then outlined how they reached the decision to apply a 50 percent reduction to the initially suggested 10-game ban.

“The panel considered Smith’s submissions relating to mitigation very carefully and determined that having taken into account paragraphs 71-75 of the Gabrillagues appeal decision and our other findings, a 50 percent reduction was justified.

“Again it is not just a matter of arithmetics and a tick box exercise. The player’s disciplinary record is not perfect. However, the only matter on his record is a two-week ban from four-and-a-half years ago when he was 24.

“The regulations do not refer to a time when a previous sanction may be disregarded for mitigation purposes. There is an element of discretion.

“The panel concluded that such is the weight of other mitigating factors, including acknowledgement of culpability, obvious and genuine remorse and considerable (and exceptional) evidence as to the player’s good character that the two-week ban from four-and-a-half years ago should not prevent the player from receiving the maximum reduction by way of mitigation available.”

* To read the full 10 -page short-form written judgment, CLICK HERE!

By Liam Heagney, RugbyPass

PV: 10
ADVERTISEMENT
Revealed: All the excuses Farrell used at his hearing - england | Rugby365